Press & awards

Blog

Ideas, updates, and practical guidance from the Snorkel team.
Image for Closing the Evaluation Gap in Agentic AI

Closing the Evaluation Gap in Agentic AI

Announcing a $3M commitment to launch Open Benchmarks Grants

February 11, 2026
All articles
Sort: Newest
Checking the Rubrics: RIFT Results on Five Public Benchmarks
NEW
Checking the Rubrics: RIFT Results on Five Public Benchmarks

Rubric-based evaluation is now a common way to score the outputs of language models and agents (Hashemi et al., 2024; Wei et al., 2025), and rubrics also serve as the source of reward signals in training (Gunjal et al., 2025; Liu et al., 2026; Ding, 2026). In both uses the rubric is the measurement instrument, and the validity of any…

Learn more about Checking the Rubrics: RIFT Results on Five Public Benchmarks
Frontier Data Summit 2026 Recap
NEW
Frontier Data Summit 2026 Recap

As agents get more capable, the data and evaluations that measure them have to become a science in their own right. Here are the sessions, takeaways and videos from the Frontier Data Summit.

Oct 16, 2026 •
Learn more about Frontier Data Summit 2026 Recap
When Partial Credit Opposes Completion
NEW
When Partial Credit Opposes Completion

AI agents are increasingly trusted with long, open-ended work. They fix bugs across large repositories, operate terminals for hours, and chain numerous tool calls toward a single goal. The strongest models now solve a meaningful share of such tasks, yet on the hardest ones failure is still the common outcome, and closing that gap is one of the central problems…

Oct 14, 2026 •
Learn more about When Partial Credit Opposes Completion
Grok 4.7 on Senior SWE-Bench: Strong pass@3, Cheaper Cost per Trial
Grok 4.7 on Senior SWE-Bench: Strong pass@3, Cheaper Cost per Trial

Grok 4.7 was evaluated on Senior SWE-Bench, our benchmark for measuring whether coding agents work like senior engineers. It reaches a tasteful pass@3 of 40.0%, up from 38.9% for Grok 4.6, ranking sixth overall at $0.24 per trial, which is a fraction of the cost compared to Opus 4.8. Benchmark Senior SWE-Bench evaluates agents as compared to a senior engineer….

Sep 21, 2026 •
Learn more about Grok 4.7 on Senior SWE-Bench: Strong pass@3, Cheaper Cost per Trial
Data 2.0 and the research era of AI data
Data 2.0 and the research era of AI data

Today, I’m excited to announce Snorkel’s $350M Series E financing at a $3.5B valuation, led by Insight and S32, with participation from Third Point, March, Blumberg, Allegis, Standard VC, Frontline, and existing investors Addition, Lightspeed, Greylock, GV, P7, Wells Fargo, Walden Catalyst Ventures, and Factory.

Sep 20, 2026 •
Learn more about Data 2.0 and the research era of AI data
From Foundational Competency to Expert Performance: A Curriculum Approach to Model Development
From Foundational Competency to Expert Performance: A Curriculum Approach to Model Development

A student does not go from 1st to 12th grade in a single step. Each grade builds on a specific set of skills, and each one assumes the previous skills have already been mastered. Nobody learns calculus without algebra. When a student skips ahead anyway, what they end up with is memorization rather than understanding. The gaps show up later,…

Sep 15, 2026 •
Learn more about From Foundational Competency to Expert Performance: A Curriculum Approach to Model Development
Terminal-Bench 4.0: Why Continuous Benchmarks Require Continuous QA
Terminal-Bench 4.0: Why Continuous Benchmarks Require Continuous QA

The speed of new frontier model releases keeps accelerating. Meanwhile benchmarks struggle to keep up and saturate quickly, often being left in the dust. Most benchmarks are static datasets with no active maintenance, causing them to lose value fast. Some benchmarks are looking to change this by becoming Continuous Benchmarks. Terminal-Bench is one of the most widely reported benchmarks on…

Aug 27, 2026 •
Learn more about Terminal-Bench 4.0: Why Continuous Benchmarks Require Continuous QA
Why Frontier Agents Fail Real Engineering Work: Two Terminal-Bench 3.0 Task Deep Dives
Why Frontier Agents Fail Real Engineering Work: Two Terminal-Bench 3.0 Task Deep Dives

Terminal-Bench 3.0 (formerly Frontier-Bench) recently launched, built to track what AI agents can and can’t do across real computer work. Terminal-Bench 2.1 has been saturating, with top agents reaching 84%; on Terminal-Bench 3.0, the best model, Claude Opus 5, achieves just 43.5%. Terminal-Bench 3.0 raises the bar with 74 authentic, verifiable tasks across 7 domains, designed to expose meaningful gaps…

Aug 20, 2026 •
Learn more about Why Frontier Agents Fail Real Engineering Work: Two Terminal-Bench 3.0 Task Deep Dives
Claude Opus 5: Performance and Error Analysis on Frontier Coding Tasks
Claude Opus 5: Performance and Error Analysis on Frontier Coding Tasks

Anthropic’s Claude Opus 5 recently debuted as the second model overall on the current Senior SWE-bench leaderboard, behind Fable 5. It also achieves the highest score of any evaluated model on the benchmark’s Bug & Performance Investigation category, reinforcing the rapid progress frontier coding models continue to make on increasingly realistic software engineering tasks. Just as notable, Opus 5 reaches…

Jul 27, 2026 •
Learn more about Claude Opus 5: Performance and Error Analysis on Frontier Coding Tasks
1 2 … 38
Image
Image

Join our newsletter

For expert advice, the latest research, and exclusive events.
By submitting this form, I acknowledge I will receive email updates from Snorkel AI, and I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that my information will be used in accordance with the Privacy Policy.